
Judgment adds to uncertainty over crypto’s exchange control status
The High Court backs the SARB’s position that moving Bitcoin to foreign exchanges can amount to an unlawful export of capital.

The High Court backs the SARB’s position that moving Bitcoin to foreign exchanges can amount to an unlawful export of capital.

In certain CPA disputes, the three-year period for pursuing a complaint begins when a supplier refuses to provide a remedy, not necessarily when the underlying service was performed.

The SCA rules that section 127(8) of the NCA empowers Magistrates’ Courts to hear these claims, but it does not bar High Court proceedings.

The judgment strengthens constitutional protections for homeowners by rejecting speculative ‘drive-by’ property valuations used in foreclosure proceedings.

The High Court’s decision shows how commission-style lead arrangements can be characterised as FAIS intermediary services, with enforceability consequences.

Leave to appeal was also refused in Hollard’s linked recovery case, where the Court ordered R39.8m to the insurer under indemnity and suretyship arrangements.

The judgment criticises the Fund’s continued resistance to medical-expense claims already addressed in earlier Western Cape rulings.

The High Court finds the Council must disclose the material it relies on before taking a decision that affects the provider’s ability to operate.

The judgment shows that misleading representations and failing to disclose material facts can ground liability, regardless of contractual terms.

Temporary fuel levy relief ends on 5 May as pressure builds at the pumps. The High Court case will test whether the minister can adjust the levy without Parliament.

A disability claim was paid, then disputed on non-disclosure grounds. Years of stalled litigation meant the court dealt with the case on procedure, not substance.

A High Court ruling has refused FirstRand’s summary judgment bid, signalling stricter scrutiny of debt claims, documentation, and enforcement processes.

Reconsidering the matter after a High Court remittal, the Tribunal finds the referral activity failed the fit and proper test.

The judgment shows that long relationships and indirect domestic contributions can justify substantial redistribution under the Divorce Act.

Penalties cannot be based on periods before the FIC assumed supervisory authority, and remediation must be fully considered when imposing sanctions.

Affidavits before the High Court set out contested positions on process, standing, and potential next steps, including whether liquidation should follow.

The Supreme Court of Appeal orders the Fund to settle R92 million in judgment debt to Newnet and comply with payment and adjudication requirements.