
Claim dismissed after decade-long delay in Discovery Life dispute
A disability claim was paid, then disputed on non-disclosure grounds. Years of stalled litigation meant the court dealt with the case on procedure, not substance.

A disability claim was paid, then disputed on non-disclosure grounds. Years of stalled litigation meant the court dealt with the case on procedure, not substance.

A High Court ruling has refused FirstRand’s summary judgment bid, signalling stricter scrutiny of debt claims, documentation, and enforcement processes.

Reconsidering the matter after a High Court remittal, the Tribunal finds the referral activity failed the fit and proper test.

The judgment shows that long relationships and indirect domestic contributions can justify substantial redistribution under the Divorce Act.

Penalties cannot be based on periods before the FIC assumed supervisory authority, and remediation must be fully considered when imposing sanctions.

Affidavits before the High Court set out contested positions on process, standing, and potential next steps, including whether liquidation should follow.

The Supreme Court of Appeal orders the Fund to settle R92 million in judgment debt to Newnet and comply with payment and adjudication requirements.

The judge finds that a policy operating on a claims-made basis responded according to when the claim was made, not when the alleged negligence occurred.

The Full Bench finds that the information available to the FSP was sufficient to justify initiating the statutory debarment process.

The High Court refuses leave to appeal a ruling directing the Master to accept an electronically signed document as the will of the late Justice Yvonne Mokgoro.

The declaration of invalidity was suspended for 24 months and referred to the Constitutional Court for confirmation.

The High Court finds that seizing a vehicle’s controls can make a passenger the legal driver under the RAF Act.

The judgment emphasises the responsibility of trustees to exercise their discretion fairly when deciding whether to withhold benefits in terms of section 37D.

The High Court finds Banxso knowingly benefited from deepfake adverts, misled clients about its licence and returns, and is ‘hopelessly insolvent’.

Medscheme’s bid to halt Bonitas’ administration transition has been delayed after procedural lapses and unresolved interlocutory issues forced the matter off the urgent roll.

Social media may feel informal, but legally it is still publication. And publication – if defamatory – can lead to court orders, retractions, and substantial legal costs.

The judgment also reinforces that generic voetstoots clauses or poorly explained limited warranties cannot waive statutory rights under the CPA.