Repaying a client loan doesn’t save a representative from debarment
The Tribunal found that repayment could not undo the misconduct of borrowing from a client and failing to disclose the arrangement.
FSP
Debarment set aside after call record contradicts key allegations
The Tribunal questioned Clientèle’s ‘free’ voucher advertising and sales script, while the insurer says its Royalty benefit is provided at no additional cost.
Tribunal: FSCA cannot impose joint-and-several penalties under section 167
The FST says the factors in section 167 of the FSRA are individual in nature and must be assessed in determining the appropriate penalty for each person.
Tribunal upholds JSE censure of Mantengu over delayed cautionary
The company should have acted in June 2023 when it suspected that confidential information about a R100-million acquisition had been compromised.
Wrong email address leaves FSP unable to pursue debarment
The Tribunal found that proceedings had not commenced before the six-month deadline, preventing it from sending the matter back for reconsideration.
Dishonesty not required for debarment on integrity grounds
The Tribunal found that a serious breach of the duty to protect confidential client information can establish unfitness even where no misuse or harm is proved.
When one dishonest act is enough for debarment
The Tribunal weighed the representative’s clean record and lack of personal gain against her deliberate falsification of a client’s investment instruction.
MBSE expands regulatory exam training with new RE1 programme
Developed in response to industry demand, the online course focuses on building the regulatory knowledge aspiring Key Individuals need for their oversight responsibilities.
The hidden compliance risks behind DOFA, onboarding and supervision
Moonstone’s Paull Lawrence shares practical insights on why DOFA is far more than an administrative record, and where hidden compliance risks can emerge for FSPs.
FSCA provisionally withdraws Imermarket’s licence
The Authority says preliminary findings point to a risk of harm to clients, but the investigation remains ongoing and Imermarket has been given an opportunity to respond.
Premium-collection relief retained for three years
The extension preserves the existing framework allowing qualifying juristic representatives to collect and deal with insurance premiums on behalf of insurers.
Insurance-cover exemption extended for underwriting managers
Qualifying Category I and Category IV underwriting-manager FSPs remain exempt from the section 13 requirement, subject to the existing conditions.
Audit report and liquidity exemption for certain FSPs renewed
Qualifying Category I FSPs that handle insurance premiums on behalf of insurers may continue relying on the existing exemption until 30 June 2029.
Private equity FAIS relief continues until 2029
Qualifying providers and certain juristic representatives will continue to benefit from targeted regulatory relief, with the existing exemption conditions unchanged.
Tribunal draws line between enforcement powers and personal redress
The decision highlights the distinction between punishing misconduct and compensating consumers who claim to have suffered losses.
Tribunal sets aside Sanlam debarment over procedural defects
The FSP could not prove key elements of the process, including proper notice of the proceedings, and the conduct of the hearing.
Tribunal draws a hard line on undisclosed client benefits
The decision turned on the adviser’s acceptance of personal benefits from a client, the lack of proper compliance disclosure, and the higher standard expected of a KI.
