Wrong email address leaves FSP unable to pursue debarment
The Tribunal found that proceedings had not commenced before the six-month deadline, preventing it from sending the matter back for reconsideration.
#financialservicesprovider
Dishonesty not required for debarment on integrity grounds
The Tribunal found that a serious breach of the duty to protect confidential client information can establish unfitness even where no misuse or harm is proved.
When one dishonest act is enough for debarment
The Tribunal weighed the representative’s clean record and lack of personal gain against her deliberate falsification of a client’s investment instruction.
MBSE expands regulatory exam training with new RE1 programme
Developed in response to industry demand, the online course focuses on building the regulatory knowledge aspiring Key Individuals need for their oversight responsibilities.
Premium-collection relief retained for three years
The extension preserves the existing framework allowing qualifying juristic representatives to collect and deal with insurance premiums on behalf of insurers.
Insurance-cover exemption extended for underwriting managers
Qualifying Category I and Category IV underwriting-manager FSPs remain exempt from the section 13 requirement, subject to the existing conditions.
Audit report and liquidity exemption for certain FSPs renewed
Qualifying Category I FSPs that handle insurance premiums on behalf of insurers may continue relying on the existing exemption until 30 June 2029.
Private equity FAIS relief continues until 2029
Qualifying providers and certain juristic representatives will continue to benefit from targeted regulatory relief, with the existing exemption conditions unchanged.
Tribunal draws line between enforcement powers and personal redress
The decision highlights the distinction between punishing misconduct and compensating consumers who claim to have suffered losses.
Tribunal sets aside Sanlam debarment over procedural defects
The FSP could not prove key elements of the process, including proper notice of the proceedings, and the conduct of the hearing.
Tribunal draws a hard line on undisclosed client benefits
The decision turned on the adviser’s acceptance of personal benefits from a client, the lack of proper compliance disclosure, and the higher standard expected of a KI.
Crypto payment-type activity may fall under FAIS, say regulators
Crypto assets fall outside the NPS Act, but intermediary-led payment-type activity involving crypto may still trigger a licensing requirement.
Debarment overturned after Tribunal criticises ‘desktop’ investigation
A failure to verify a client’s income amounted at most to negligence, but the evidence did not justify debarment for dishonesty.
FST sets aside debarment after finding contradictions in forensic evidence
Sanlam found that the client’s signatures were forged, but its own handwriting expert came to a different conclusion.
Equality Court: 2021 licence relief did not extend to FSPs
Ministerial Directives issued in July 2021 applied only to specified businesses under the Businesses Act, not to FAIS-regulated FSPs.
Unauthorised policies falsely attributed to a junior accredited rep
The Tribunal confirms Assupol’s decision to debar a representative after forensic evidence showed he advised on life policies while unauthorised.
FST upholds debarment over ‘ghost caller’ policy
The evidence accumulated by Momentum supported its finding that the agent lacked honesty and integrity.
