
Court upholds R200 000 fine on dealership for ignoring compliance notice
The judgment makes it clear that remedies under the CPA – refund or replacement – are enforceable and cannot be frustrated by delay or technical objections.

The judgment makes it clear that remedies under the CPA – refund or replacement – are enforceable and cannot be frustrated by delay or technical objections.

The High Court’s ruling clarifies that clinically necessary cosmetic interventions can be recognised as legitimate past medical expenses in personal injury claims.

The Full Bench provides its reasons for dismissing the EFF’s attempt to halt the Minister of Finance’s decision to increase the general fuel levy.

The Court says credit providers must ensure full transparency in disclosing the nature, cost, and financing implications of these charges.

A High Court ruling shows that failing to keep a safe following distance – and failing to back up your story with solid evidence – can cost you your case as well as your claim.

Eastern Cape court rules section 25 claims need credible proof of electricity causing damage.

The curator will assess Sizwe Hosmed’s finances and recommend whether it should merge, be liquidated, or continue.

The High Court upholds a National Consumer Tribunal ruling that the dealer must refund the purchase price and pay a fine for breaching the Consumer Protection Act.

Designated employers must begin aligning their workplace demographics with the Employment Equity Act’s numerical targets from 1 September.

Judge says there is a prima facie case that the trading platform does not operate within the confines of the law.

Ditsobotla is in worse financial shape than previously thought, and the resolution process is unlikely to turn things around.

Old Mutual Alternate Risk Transfer wants to access data held by SA Guarantee Specialists after discovering that offshore guarantees were issued without authorisation.

The High Court says the state-owned financier must comply with deposit controls while awaiting the Supreme Court of Appeal’s ruling.

The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.

The Constitutional Court finds that a fund relied on unverified, one-sided information and failed to establish the extent of factual dependency.

The repayment administrator and the Prudential Authority appealed a High Court ruling that allowed Ithala to continue operating while liquidation proceedings are pending.

As a result of the accident, the plaintiff is a paraplegic and will require extensive ongoing medical treatment.