
Sanctions-screening software is no shield against non-compliance
The FIC’s new manual explains when institutions should screen clients, how they must assess possible matches, and what follows when sanctioned property is identified.

The FIC’s new manual explains when institutions should screen clients, how they must assess possible matches, and what follows when sanctioned property is identified.

Draft PCC 126 sets out when dealers fall within FICA’s high-value goods category and explains the resulting registration and compliance obligations.

Higher-risk institutions were found wanting on RMCPs, customer due diligence, registration requirements, and targeted financial sanctions screening.

Demand for financial intelligence remained high as the Centre supported court proceedings, asset-recovery work, and the Madlanga Commission.

CASPs helped the FIC exceed its illicit-flow intelligence target, while only 176 of the 362 registered providers submitted Directive 7 returns.

The Court says confidential information cannot be disclosed simply because it may be relevant to litigation, reinforcing the protections built into FICA.

The wording of several provisions has been refined, but procurement-related drafting and the response to concerns raised by the NPO sector remain outstanding.

The sanctions against Capitec, Ninety One Assurance, and Albaraka arose from inspections conducted between 2021 and 2023.

The sanctions cover a range of shortcomings, from deficient RMCPs and customer checks to sanctions screening, registration, and failures to provide information.

The affected institutions face October deadlines, while the consultation feedback provides guidance on how the requirement applies in practice.

Two limited FICA changes were indicated, while the FSCA explained why the financial-sector provisions would not be amended.

The adviser breached Sanlam’s internal cash-handling rule, but the conduct did not establish a lack of honesty and integrity.

Institutions will have to identify and verify owners, assess their honesty and integrity at least every two years, and report beneficial-owner information to regulators.

Its submission to Parliament highlights concerns about lifestyle audits, information sharing, beneficial ownership, and administrative fines.

The final Guidance Note makes targeted changes, but the regulator’s feedback discloses how it weighed industry concerns and refined key aspects of the guidance.

The Regulatory Actions Report shows how the Authority is combining penalties, licence withdrawals, and debarments to tackle serious misconduct.

Many institutions have left registration too late, submitted the wrong documents, or filed branch returns instead of consolidated legal entity returns.