Tribunal draws line between discipline and debarment
An FSP cannot treat debarment as an automatic consequence of a disciplinary finding, the Tribunal says, setting aside a process riddled with procedural failures.
#FinancialAdvisoryandIntermediaryServicesAct
Tribunal sets aside Sanlam debarment over client cash deposits
The adviser breached Sanlam’s internal cash-handling rule, but the conduct did not establish a lack of honesty and integrity.
Tribunal upholds debarment over R1.1m ‘protection’ payments
The applicant’s own admissions supported Sanlam’s decision, and the section 14 process does not mirror a disciplinary hearing or a trial.
Representative’s ‘fate was sealed before she was heard’
The Tribunal found both that the process was unfair and that the FSP had not established dishonesty, recklessness, or lack of fitness and propriety.
Tribunal ruling reinforces substance over form in insurance
CDH says the decision highlights the risks for businesses that incorporate cover or risk-transfer arrangements into broader commercial offerings.
FSP ‘cannot sidestep’ restraint question in dishonesty case
The Tribunal finds that the alleged misrepresentation, non-disclosure, and materiality all depended on the contractual issue the FSP declined to establish.
FST draws the line between suspicion and proof in adviser’s debarment case
The decision examines why client complaints, cellphone records, and handwriting evidence failed to establish dishonesty on a balance of probabilities.
Poor sales process alone does not justify debarment
The Tribunal held that procedural shortcomings must be distinguished from conduct showing a representative lacks honesty and integrity.
Internal record manipulation can justify debarment, Tribunal finds
Five related decisions involving former Pineapple reps illustrate how misconduct affecting internal operational records may engage the honesty and integrity requirements.
Retiring broker’s move to rival FSP was not dishonest, Tribunal finds
The source of an obligation does not determine whether disputed conduct amounts to genuine fit-and-proper misconduct.
Premium-collection relief retained for three years
The extension preserves the existing framework allowing qualifying juristic representatives to collect and deal with insurance premiums on behalf of insurers.
Insurance-cover exemption extended for underwriting managers
Qualifying Category I and Category IV underwriting-manager FSPs remain exempt from the section 13 requirement, subject to the existing conditions.
Audit report and liquidity exemption for certain FSPs renewed
Qualifying Category I FSPs that handle insurance premiums on behalf of insurers may continue relying on the existing exemption until 30 June 2029.
Private equity FAIS relief continues until 2029
Qualifying providers and certain juristic representatives will continue to benefit from targeted regulatory relief, with the existing exemption conditions unchanged.
Tribunal clarifies test for qualification exemptions
The ruling explains why exemption applications require objective statutory grounds rather than pleas for indulgence.
Referral fees and FAIS: when a lead becomes intermediation
The High Court’s decision shows how commission-style lead arrangements can be characterised as FAIS intermediary services, with enforceability consequences.
Strengthening South Africa’s sustainable finance framework
The FSCA’s Sustainable Finance Programme seeks to harmonise local markets with global ESG standards – focusing on taxonomy, disclosure, reporting and investor education to bolster climate resilience.
