
Death claims test trustees as section 37C meets real-world complexity
From disputed dependants to contested deaths, trustees are judged on how they investigate and explain their decisions.

From disputed dependants to contested deaths, trustees are judged on how they investigate and explain their decisions.

Dependency is assessed at the member’s date of death, and trustees must conduct active investigations and apply a principled equitable allocation process.

The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.

The Constitutional Court rules that whether someone qualifies as a dependant must be determined as at the date of a retirement fund member’s death, not when the fund decides how to distribute the benefit.

The Constitutional Court finds that a fund relied on unverified, one-sided information and failed to establish the extent of factual dependency.

The FST has upheld a ruling that a legal spouse must still prove financial dependence or be nominated to receive a share of a deceased member’s pension benefit.

High Court hands down a decision on the interpretation of the tracing provision in section 37C of the Pension Funds Act.

Interpretation Ruling 1 of 2020 incorrectly brought an unclaimed benefit within the ambit of section 37C of the Pension Funds Act.