
Tribunal upholds debarment over R1.1m ‘protection’ payments
The applicant’s own admissions supported Sanlam’s decision, and the section 14 process does not mirror a disciplinary hearing or a trial.

The applicant’s own admissions supported Sanlam’s decision, and the section 14 process does not mirror a disciplinary hearing or a trial.

The Tribunal found both that the process was unfair and that the FSP had not established dishonesty, recklessness, or lack of fitness and propriety.

The Tribunal finds that the alleged misrepresentation, non-disclosure, and materiality all depended on the contractual issue the FSP declined to establish.

The Tribunal finds that the applicant’s contractual and supervision agreements meant she was a ‘representative’, placing her within the FAIS framework and its mandatory debarment provisions.

Advocate John Simpson publishes his Office’s draft budget for public comment.

FSPs will have to budget for an additional R32 per key individual or representative in the 2025/26 financial year.

The first in a series of articles that explains the competence requirements for people who want to enter the financial services industry.

Material discrepancies about a newly appointed financial planner’s employment history came to light while she was being on-boarded.

The FSCA has confirmed that the provision for a pro rata reduction in CPD hours as a result of parental leave, or because of illness or disability, applies only to an FSP’s representatives, […]