
Insurer cannot rely on policy terms after adviser’s misrepresentation
A policyholder’s godfather was recorded as her father despite the adviser knowing the true relationship, leading to a ruling that the insurer must pay the claim.

A policyholder’s godfather was recorded as her father despite the adviser knowing the true relationship, leading to a ruling that the insurer must pay the claim.

An NFO case highlights the requirements of Rule 17.8.6 and the consequences when an insurer fails to communicate during a prolonged claims process.

The Appeal Tribunal found that an undisclosed diagnostic test was not material to the insurer’s assessment of the risk and ordered the claim to be paid.

The NFO found that a property owner could not avoid responsibility for an increased risk where poor construction, electrical defects, and tenant conduct contributed to the loss.

The Appeal Tribunal found that voluntary pre-claim benefit increases were distinct from post-claim escalation and could not be used to support a fixed 10% increase.

An FSP failed to ensure that a client was made aware of the implications of modifying his policy, resulting in an insurance claim denial.