
I-SCA icacisa ngokuba semthethweni ‘kwemirhumo yendlela’ kwizivumelwano zemali zezithuthi
INkundla ithi ababoneleli ngetyala kufuneka baqinisekise ukungafihli ngokupheleleyo ekuvezeni uhlobo, iindleko, kunye neziphumo zenkxaso-mali yeze ntlawulo.

INkundla ithi ababoneleli ngetyala kufuneka baqinisekise ukungafihli ngokupheleleyo ekuvezeni uhlobo, iindleko, kunye neziphumo zenkxaso-mali yeze ntlawulo.

The Court replaces the restrictive ‘exceptional circumstances’ test with a flexible ‘good cause’ standard, creating new forum-choice opportunities.

The Supreme Court confirms that any post-default restructuring of NCA-regulated loans must comply strictly with the Act.

The Supreme Court of Appeal will hear arguments on the merits if the appeal is upheld.

Until the suspensive condition is met, the right to performance is suspended and the prescription clock does not run.

The judgment confirms that municipalities can be held legally responsible when known public dangers, such as an uncovered stormwater drain, lead to injury or death.

The Court says credit providers must ensure full transparency in disclosing the nature, cost, and financing implications of these charges.

The proposal restricts the ‘bona fide inadvertent error’ defence under the understatement penalty regime to cases where the tax shortfall is a ‘substantial understatement’.

The majority finds the accreditation mechanism effectively coerced funds to amend their rules or risk losing employer contributions – undermining trustees’ fiduciary duties under the PFA.

Dependency is assessed at the member’s date of death, and trustees must conduct active investigations and apply a principled equitable allocation process.

The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.

The Constitutional Court rules that whether someone qualifies as a dependant must be determined as at the date of a retirement fund member’s death, not when the fund decides how to distribute the benefit.

The Supreme Court of Appeal found in favour of SARS despite it ignoring a 45-day timeline for more than a year.

The Constitutional Court finds that a fund relied on unverified, one-sided information and failed to establish the extent of factual dependency.

The group may have to adjust its R3.3bn litigation provision to accommodate the criteria of the regulator’s proposed redress scheme.

The repayment administrator and the Prudential Authority appealed a High Court ruling that allowed Ithala to continue operating while liquidation proceedings are pending.

The Supreme Court of Appeal confirms that a member’s ownership stake alone does not trigger personal liability for a close corporation’s debts.