
Representative’s ‘fate was sealed before she was heard’
The Tribunal found both that the process was unfair and that the FSP had not established dishonesty, recklessness, or lack of fitness and propriety.

The Tribunal found both that the process was unfair and that the FSP had not established dishonesty, recklessness, or lack of fitness and propriety.

The Tribunal finds that the alleged misrepresentation, non-disclosure, and materiality all depended on the contractual issue the FSP declined to establish.

Case law highlights the drafting, evidence, and settlement pitfalls that can determine whether valuable client relationships and confidential information remain protected.

The source of an obligation does not determine whether disputed conduct amounts to genuine fit-and-proper misconduct.

The Labour Appeal Court confirms that termination – even for misconduct – does not extinguish a restraint of trade, unless tainted by fraud or bad faith.

Allowing an appeal to suspend the restraint would render the firm’s contractual protection meaningless, as the restraint period could expire before an appeal is heard.

Three recent judgments in employment disputes underscore that courts will enforce only those restraint-of-trade clauses that are drafted with precision, protect a genuine employer interest, and strike a fair balance between competition and individual freedom

A recent judgment suggests employers may lose the right to enforce restraints of trade when they terminate staff for misconduct.

The High Court rules on a former employee’s contention that the FSP’s notice of intention to debar was a breach of their settlement agreement.

The FSP failed to prove the existence of a protectable or that the restraint had been breached.

The judgment shows that ‘reasonable apprehension’ can tip the scales in favour of enforcing trade restraints and confidentiality agreements.

The new Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court rules bring significant procedural changes to streamline processes and tackle case backlogs.

The Labour Court upholds AdviceWorx’s application to enforce its restraint agreements against advisers who joined Wealth Associates.

Two insurance brokers found themselves under the scrutiny of the Labour Court, as they were called to account for soliciting clients from their previous employer.