
Non-responsive retirement funds face stricter action from Adjudicator
Summonses and subpoenas may be used to address non-cooperation by funds and administrators, as the OPFA seeks to improve the efficiency of its investigations.

Summonses and subpoenas may be used to address non-cooperation by funds and administrators, as the OPFA seeks to improve the efficiency of its investigations.

Misaligned statutory deadlines for employee retirement fund contributions raise practical compliance questions, particularly for employers with non-monthly payroll cycles.

The framework formalises complaint-handling procedures, introduces mechanisms such as conciliation and summary dismissal, and will be implemented in phases.

The Minister of Employment and Labour removes a 2003 exemption that shielded employers from labour-inspector oversight.

The draft Rules for the Office of the Pension Funds Adjudicator formalise existing procedures and align the OPFA with COFI and the cross-scheme framework.

Expanding the Office’s mandate to include disputes involving advice will enhance member protection, but there are concerns over jurisdictional overlaps and operational costs.

The majority finds the accreditation mechanism effectively coerced funds to amend their rules or risk losing employer contributions – undermining trustees’ fiduciary duties under the PFA.

Dependency is assessed at the member’s date of death, and trustees must conduct active investigations and apply a principled equitable allocation process.

The Department of Employment and Labour is withdrawing a determination that prevented inspectors from enforcing section 34A of the BCEA.

The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.

The Constitutional Court rules that whether someone qualifies as a dependant must be determined as at the date of a retirement fund member’s death, not when the fund decides how to distribute the benefit.

A breakdown of the provisions that are in effect now, and those that come into operation in six or 12 months.

The Constitutional Court finds that a fund relied on unverified, one-sided information and failed to establish the extent of factual dependency.

The final Notice removes confusing references to section 14(8), but calls for a wholesale carve-out of retail-to-retail transfers were turned down.

The OPFA confirms that penalty interest on late employer contributions may not exceed the original capital owing – in line with the Full Bench’s judgment in March.

The Full Bench affirms that interest under the Pension Funds Act is capped by the common law in duplum rule.

In response to industry calls, the Authority has drafted an exemption from the section 14(1) process for retail retirement funds.