
R9.2m RAF claim crashes over tailgating and lack of proof
A High Court ruling shows that failing to keep a safe following distance – and failing to back up your story with solid evidence – can cost you your case as well as your claim.

A High Court ruling shows that failing to keep a safe following distance – and failing to back up your story with solid evidence – can cost you your case as well as your claim.

Eastern Cape court rules section 25 claims need credible proof of electricity causing damage.

The curator will assess Sizwe Hosmed’s finances and recommend whether it should merge, be liquidated, or continue.

The High Court upholds a National Consumer Tribunal ruling that the dealer must refund the purchase price and pay a fine for breaching the Consumer Protection Act.

Designated employers must begin aligning their workplace demographics with the Employment Equity Act’s numerical targets from 1 September.

Judge says there is a prima facie case that the trading platform does not operate within the confines of the law.

Ditsobotla is in worse financial shape than previously thought, and the resolution process is unlikely to turn things around.

Old Mutual Alternate Risk Transfer wants to access data held by SA Guarantee Specialists after discovering that offshore guarantees were issued without authorisation.

The High Court says the state-owned financier must comply with deposit controls while awaiting the Supreme Court of Appeal’s ruling.

The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.

The Constitutional Court finds that a fund relied on unverified, one-sided information and failed to establish the extent of factual dependency.

The repayment administrator and the Prudential Authority appealed a High Court ruling that allowed Ithala to continue operating while liquidation proceedings are pending.

As a result of the accident, the plaintiff is a paraplegic and will require extensive ongoing medical treatment.

After the High Court remitted the matter, a new Tribunal panel deemed the challenge ‘frivolous and vexatious’.

As a result of the declarator, the High Court ordered the Tribunal to revisit its decision regarding the R50m fine imposed on Viceroy Research.

The ruling requires insurers to plead subrogation and join as parties in civil actions, departing from long-standing practice that allows insurers to step into their insured’s shoes without separate citation.

Judge dismisses claim both marriages are valid, sending dispute back for further evidence on the customary marriage’s existence.