
Full Bench adds weight to challenges against RAF medical expense directives
Internal directives cannot displace court orders or long-standing principles governing compensation, says the Western Cape High Court.

Internal directives cannot displace court orders or long-standing principles governing compensation, says the Western Cape High Court.

The case focuses attention on how the exchange control framework applies to crypto platforms that facilitate offshore trading through loans.

The CMS frames the judgment as necessary to protect members, emphasising the scheme is compliant, operational and under close oversight.

Bonitas’ decision to change administrators comes amid a CMS investigation and High Court proceedings involving its former service provider.

Was a beneficiary nomination signed under a power of attorney and submitted after death valid?

The FST erred because it focused on contractual obligations rather than the broader fit and proper requirements.

Dissolving a marriage in community of property while deferring questions about the joint estate is neither conceptually sound nor workable.

The initial payout returns roughly 6 cents on the rand to creditors, with legal costs taking a large slice – but further recoveries may change the final dividend.

The High Court confirms that evidence from confidential arbitration can be disclosed in related South African litigation, forcing insurers and other parties to rethink how they manage arbitration materials.

The SCA rules that buyers may rely on actio redhibitoria to unwind financed vehicle purchases marred by latent defects, even when the deal falls under the NCA.

The High Court has overturned the Regulator’s bid to stop the publication of the matric results, rejecting its claim that learners can be identified from exam numbers.

The Court set aside two notices to the Municipal Employees Pension Fund after finding the regulator had not met the statutory thresholds.

Modern contract interpretation permits surrounding circumstances to explain contractual meaning – undermining SARS’s argument that extrinsic evidence is inadmissible.

The Tribunal and the High Court delivered key decisions emphasising proportional enforcement and the proper use of transitional provisions.

A High Court ruling confirms that SARS must honour lawful settlement agreements and cannot rely on internal systems or administrative hurdles to escape binding terms.

A subsequent, corrected section 129 notice cannot cure defects in the original notice once summary judgment proceedings have begun.

The High Court strikes FirstRand’s repossession action after finding the defendant died months before summons was issued.