
Life insurer debars rep who ‘went off-script’ during sales call
The agent repeatedly deviated from the approved product script. Previous warnings and documented missteps played a key role in the decision.

The agent repeatedly deviated from the approved product script. Previous warnings and documented missteps played a key role in the decision.

The case highlights that debarment is reserved for instances of clear, intentional breaches of integrity, not mere negligence.

FSPs must ensure their representatives operate strictly within their authorised product categories and according to the client’s mandate.

The Tribunal finds the FSP skipped critical steps, including notifying the representative and giving her an opportunity to respond.

The decisions show that even thwarted attempts to breach confidentiality signal a critical lapse in integrity.

The arrest of two more former Steinhoff executives ties back to a fraudulent scheme involving a handwritten note by Markus Jooste.

The High Court confirms the Prudential Authority’s right to challenge Tribunal decisions while affirming the limits of retrospective penalties.

The ruling underscores that disputes over unapproved disability claims underwritten by insurers through employer-held policies must be addressed with employers and insurers.

The Tribunal’s ruling highlights that following the correct process is as important as addressing misconduct in the financial services sector.

The case illustrates how discrepancies in disclosure can undermine an individual’s suitability for a key role, resulting in the rejection of a licence application.

The Tribunal’s decision underscores that financial advisers’ duties are limited to the specific terms of their engagement.
The Ombud failed to investigate key facts around the broker’s alleged negligence in communicating an essential policy requirement.

The huge penalties imposed by the FSCA and the Prudential Authority raise questions about the clarity and consistency of the factors influencing these fines.

The planner acted in the client’s best interest, highlighting the importance of clear communication and thorough record-keeping in financial advice.

The rep claimed he never meant to harm the FSP, but the FST found his actions violated the FAIS Act and demonstrated a lack of integrity.

The FST orders the FSCA to reconsider key decisions regarding the Municipal Employees Pension Fund, saying the regulator overstepped its authority.

The adviser said she shared the client information to prove her remuneration when applying for a job with a competitor.