
Tribunal: FSCA cannot impose joint-and-several penalties under section 167
The FST says the factors in section 167 of the FSRA are individual in nature and must be assessed in determining the appropriate penalty for each person.

The FST says the factors in section 167 of the FSRA are individual in nature and must be assessed in determining the appropriate penalty for each person.

The FSCA improperly allowed cost-recovery considerations to influence the sanction and did not assess the applicant’s financial benefit separately from his client’s.

The company should have acted in June 2023 when it suspected that confidential information about a R100-million acquisition had been compromised.

The Tribunal found that proceedings had not commenced before the six-month deadline, preventing it from sending the matter back for reconsideration.

The Tribunal found that a serious breach of the duty to protect confidential client information can establish unfitness even where no misuse or harm is proved.

The Tribunal weighed the representative’s clean record and lack of personal gain against her deliberate falsification of a client’s investment instruction.

Moonstone’s updated calculator enables FSPs to estimate their Schedule 2, Ombud Council, Tribunal, and FAIS Ombud levy components.

An FSP cannot treat debarment as an automatic consequence of a disciplinary finding, the Tribunal says, setting aside a process riddled with procedural failures.

The adviser breached Sanlam’s internal cash-handling rule, but the conduct did not establish a lack of honesty and integrity.

The Tribunal found that evidence of tax non-residence must be assessed against the legislation, with clear reasons given when it is considered insufficient.

The Tribunal finds that commercial circumstances did not justify implementing a major transaction before shareholder approval.

The Tribunal says the Adjudicator shifted the evidentiary goalpost over three determinations and passively accepted uncorroborated allegations.

Steinhoff, Banxso, N-e-FG, and Viceroy show that imposing an administrative penalty is often only the beginning of a lengthy legal and recovery process.

Updates disclose why the Tongaat Hulett and AYO matters remain unfinished, while the Curro case has now become a formal investigation.

Key judgments clarified the FSCA’s ability to investigate misconduct, resist procedural delays, and pursue cross-border enforcement.

The regulator is scrutinising how derivative positions, suspicious trading, and failures by gatekeepers can undermine market integrity.

The applicant’s own admissions supported Sanlam’s decision, and the section 14 process does not mirror a disciplinary hearing or a trial.