
Retiring broker’s move to rival FSP was not dishonest, Tribunal finds
The source of an obligation does not determine whether disputed conduct amounts to genuine fit-and-proper misconduct.

The source of an obligation does not determine whether disputed conduct amounts to genuine fit-and-proper misconduct.

The decision clarifies when prior civil proceedings may prevent the Pension Funds Adjudicator from investigating a complaint over withheld benefits.

The ruling explains why exemption applications require objective statutory grounds rather than pleas for indulgence.

The decision highlights the distinction between punishing misconduct and compensating consumers who claim to have suffered losses.

Most FSCA levies will rise by 3.2%, but retirement funds face a 15% increase in the OPFA levy, and charges are introduced for some entities.

The FSP could not prove key elements of the process, including proper notice of the proceedings, and the conduct of the hearing.

The FST dismisses former EOH director Anushka Bogdanov’s application for reconsideration of sanctions imposed over misrepresented qualifications.

The decision turned on the adviser’s acceptance of personal benefits from a client, the lack of proper compliance disclosure, and the higher standard expected of a KI.

The deputy adjudicator finds the ‘freeze’ clause the fund relied on is tied to its DB rules and can’t be used to block a DC member’s savings withdrawal.

The Adjudicator conflated jurisdiction with enforcement and overlooked the potential personal-liability provisions in the PFA.

The Tribunal says membership could end only in accordance with the fund’s rules, and WhatsApp exchanges did not amount to a valid withdrawal.

The FST rejects the member’s loss calculation based on assumed money market returns, affirming that the fund’s rules limit accrual to bank interest.

The FST dismisses African Bank’s application to overturn a directive to reverse a R685m intra-group transaction, finding it lacked commercial substance.

The dismissal of a reconsideration application by CMM investors underscores that only direct legal rights – not indirect financial interests – confer standing under the FSRA.

Reconsidering the matter after a High Court remittal, the Tribunal finds the referral activity failed the fit and proper test.

The law firm says recent FAIS Ombud and Tribunal decisions highlight disclosure, suitability, and record-keeping failures in replacement policy cases.

A failure to verify a client’s income amounted at most to negligence, but the evidence did not justify debarment for dishonesty.