
Tribunal affirms Ombud’s stance on credit life cover complaint
After the High Court remitted the matter, a new Tribunal panel deemed the challenge ‘frivolous and vexatious’.

After the High Court remitted the matter, a new Tribunal panel deemed the challenge ‘frivolous and vexatious’.

The Tribunal agrees with the FSCA that the entity’s key individual did not ‘come clean’ about her past misconduct.

The FSCA records a marked increase in new investigations in 2024/25, particularly those related to unregistered insurance business.

The FSP’s allegations that the representative violated the terms of the settlement and service agreements did constitute a material breach of the FAIS Act.

Section 14(1)(b) of the FAIS Act cannot be stretched to catch misconduct discovered after a representative’s tenure.

The Tribunal agrees with the Prudential Authority that Women Building our Africa failed to meet the registration conditions and governance benchmarks.

Unlike FSCA-imposed bans with fixed terms, debarments driven by an FSP stay in force until another FSP is convinced a rep is Fit and Proper.

The proposed CEO breached the Companies Act by allowing another company of which he was the sole shareholder to advance loans to him while it was insolvent.

The material change from a co-policyholder to a sole policyholder should have alerted the FSP of the need to review the policy.

The Tribunal confirmed Standard Bank’s decision to debar its representative for borrowing thousands of rands from his clients and failing to disclose his outside business activities.

The Tribunal finds the FSCA acted beyond its legal authority by imposing a three-year time limit on an exemption, reaffirming a key precedent on regulatory overreach.

Deputy Pension Funds Adjudicator Naheem Essop shares how OPFA’s inquisitorial process works, the challenges funds face with internal dispute resolution, and what happens when complaints escalate or are deemed frivolous.

A nominee who receives a dependency allocation can still claim a share of any surplus death benefit according to the deceased’s nominations.

The OPFA on how retirement funds should address non-compliant employers, death benefit allocations, and requests to withhold benefits.

The Tribunal says the Adjudicator should have addressed the fund’s reliance on two acknowledgements of debt stating different amounts.

The Tribunal says individuals who are subject to administrative action are entitled to fair processes that include the speedy finalisation of their matter

The FST has upheld a ruling that a legal spouse must still prove financial dependence or be nominated to receive a share of a deceased member’s pension benefit.