
Unauthorised policies falsely attributed to a junior accredited rep
The Tribunal confirms Assupol’s decision to debar a representative after forensic evidence showed he advised on life policies while unauthorised.

The Tribunal confirms Assupol’s decision to debar a representative after forensic evidence showed he advised on life policies while unauthorised.

The evidence accumulated by Momentum supported its finding that the agent lacked honesty and integrity.

The Tribunal said allegations of not following sales scripts may breach internal policy but do not in themselves demonstrate dishonesty or a lack of integrity.

The Tribunal agrees with the FSCA that the entity’s key individual did not ‘come clean’ about her past misconduct.

Section 14(1)(b) of the FAIS Act cannot be stretched to catch misconduct discovered after a representative’s tenure.

Luvuyo Burial and Consulting did not pay the claims in full even after the Ombud’s Office intervened.

The beneficiaries waited months to be paid their funeral policy benefits, but they received only partial pay-outs despite undertakings to the contrary.

Unlike FSCA-imposed bans with fixed terms, debarments driven by an FSP stay in force until another FSP is convinced a rep is Fit and Proper.

The judgment clarifies aspects of the FAIS Act, particularly regarding the nature of ‘advice’ and ‘intermediary services’.