
FSCA imposes R2.5m fine for unauthorised derivatives trading
About R1 million in investors’ funds was misappropriated.

About R1 million in investors’ funds was misappropriated.

Applicant tells the tribunal she transferred the information to her private Gmail account to support her complaint to the CCMA.

The far-reaching implications of debarment were not justified in the circumstances, the FST finds.

Former Standard Bank staff contend that the FAIS Act did not apply to their debarment and conduct.

More than 600 investors lost their money – some exceeding R1 million each.

FST’s decision reveals a litany of problems with the procedure followed.

Applicant argues that non-compliance is not a contravention when the law does not provide for a penalty.

A single act of dishonesty, incompetence, mismanagement or negligence may not by itself be grounds for debarment.

This case sends a serious warning to those who allow “spotters” to work under their licence.

Tribunal draws attention to the effect of selling the franchise house business on the financial adviser agreement.

And how the Financial Services Tribunal assesses whether the fine was appropriate.

It also clarifies the relationship between the courts’ findings and the reconsideration application.

Ignoring emailed notices of an intention to debar doesn’t make them go away.

Debarment is an extremely important aspect of your obligations and rights under the FAIS Act and the Financial Sector Regulation Act.

Tribunal asked to rule on the impact of a labour dispute settlement agreement on an FSP’s debarment decision.

The number of authorised FSPs declined by 1.12% between 2021 and 2022, despite the FSCA approving more FSPs this year, the Authority’s annual report for the year to the end of March shows. […]

Financial Services Tribunal sets out why the policy’s absence from the record is not fatal to a procedurally fair process.