
Debarment set aside after Tribunal flags timing discrepancies
The effective date recorded on the FSCA’s register pre-dated any opportunity to make representations.

The effective date recorded on the FSCA’s register pre-dated any opportunity to make representations.

The FST erred because it focused on contractual obligations rather than the broader fit and proper requirements.

The falsification of an insurance claim and improper referral payments are incompatible with the fit and proper requirements.

The Authority says the penalties reflect the financial benefit gained from unlawful conduct and the harm to clients – handing 30-year debarments to several Banxso executives.

The FSCA imposes a R197m fine on Medbond Insurance Brokers and its principal, whom it debarred for 30 years.

The FSCA’s investigation concluded that South African Relocations and The Relocations Group offered marine insurance without registration.

The Authority found that most investor funds were used to pay ‘returns’ to other investors and cover personal expenses.

Classic Financial Services edges closer to closure as the first liquidation and distribution account is formally lodged for public inspection.

The insurer did not provide supporting documents or call recordings that could resolve the material disputes of fact.

Despite a guilty plea at a disciplinary hearing, a rep’s debarment was set aside after the Tribunal found the FSP had not followed the prescribed process.

The former Sanlam Life representative claimed his brother only assisted him in an administrative or logistical capacity.

The Tribunal finds that the applicant’s contractual and supervision agreements meant she was a ‘representative’, placing her within the FAIS framework and its mandatory debarment provisions.

The planner said his employee performed administrative tasks and denied that the engagements constituted ‘advice’ under the FAIS Act.

The Tribunal says that even informal communications qualify as regulated advice if they involve financial recommendations.

The Tribunal confirms Assupol’s decision to debar a representative after forensic evidence showed he advised on life policies while unauthorised.

The evidence accumulated by Momentum supported its finding that the agent lacked honesty and integrity.

The Tribunal said allegations of not following sales scripts may breach internal policy but do not in themselves demonstrate dishonesty or a lack of integrity.