
FIC provides practical guide to RMCP submissions under Directive 12
The FIC has laid out the practical steps for accountable institutions facing their first RMCP submission deadlines under Directive 12.

The FIC has laid out the practical steps for accountable institutions facing their first RMCP submission deadlines under Directive 12.

The 2025/26 Integrated Report records supervisory work on disclosure, customer consent, transactional fees, and customer treatment.

CASPs helped the FIC exceed its illicit-flow intelligence target, while only 176 of the 362 registered providers submitted Directive 7 returns.

The affected institutions face October deadlines, while the consultation feedback provides guidance on how the requirement applies in practice.

Early industry reaction focuses the implications for stablecoin payments and self-custody wallets, and the compliance burden.

Many institutions have left registration too late, submitted the wrong documents, or filed branch returns instead of consolidated legal entity returns.

The draft directive will introduce a new recurring compliance obligation, with updated programmes also having to be lodged within 10 business days of approval.

The Centre has refined the directive’s scope and addressed concerns over its legal basis, administrative burden, and practical application.

Experts say taxpayers with undeclared crypto income should consider voluntary disclosure before enhanced reporting increases the likelihood of a SARS audit.

Less than half of the first group of accountable institutions had submitted their returns by mid-July, while submissions from the second group are low.

The regulator reports steady progress in licensing while sharing lessons from its AML inspections of authorised providers.

The FIC says fewer than 12% of accountable institutions facing the first filing deadline had submitted their returns by the middle of this month.

PCC 60 largely preserves the draft framework but clarifies how newly registered firms must report and confirms that third parties may not submit returns.

Crypto assets fall outside the NPS Act, but intermediary-led payment-type activity involving crypto may still trigger a licensing requirement.

Treasury and the SARB say the proposals are not intended to criminalise crypto possession and have extended the deadline to comment.

The specified accountable institutions have until 30 June or 31 July to complete and submit their RCRs.

Exchanges say the draft could affect routine crypto use, while one legal analysis questions whether the framework is truly more permissive.