
FSPs sanctioned for FICA failures – fines totalling R700 000
The FSCA found both firms lacked effective risk management capabilities, including deficient RMCPs, poor customer due diligence, and failures to screen against the sanctions lists.

The FSCA found both firms lacked effective risk management capabilities, including deficient RMCPs, poor customer due diligence, and failures to screen against the sanctions lists.

The evidence accumulated by Momentum supported its finding that the agent lacked honesty and integrity.

A proposed amendment to the Income Tax Act will tax unit trust investors on capital distributions before disposals, without any base cost offset.

The proposed amendments will also see increases in the Tribunal levy and the FAIS Ombud’s charge per KI/representative.

Financial institutions subject to Joint Standards 1 of 2023 and 2 of 2024 are asked to provide feedback by 5 October 2025.

Sixty-year-old legislation continues to bind litigants to physical processes, even as remote work and electronic communication have become the norm.

The Court says credit providers must ensure full transparency in disclosing the nature, cost, and financing implications of these charges.

The Regulations have allowed credit bureaus to obtain consumer information from educational institutions for the past 19 years.

The Tribunal said allegations of not following sales scripts may breach internal policy but do not in themselves demonstrate dishonesty or a lack of integrity.

Pierre Erasmus said the sanctions were disproportionate, and his dealings with clients were friendships, not formal business relationships.

The code sets out how dismissals must meet substantive and procedural fairness requirements.

Proposed amendments could undermine the tax-efficient compounding that makes a collective investment scheme an attractive investment vehicle.

The client initially swore to non-consent, but in a second affidavit he said drugs clouded his memory, insisting he was present when the policies were initiated.

New criteria require closer supervisory scrutiny of DNFBPs on market entry, ongoing oversight, and high-quality suspicious-transaction reporting.

The High Court upholds a National Consumer Tribunal ruling that the dealer must refund the purchase price and pay a fine for breaching the Consumer Protection Act.

Information officers should purge Form A from internal and public systems and replace it with Form 2 immediately.

The updated guidance gives concrete examples of compliance failures and explicitly states that poorly documented RMCPs may be treated as non-compliant.