Insurance quote manipulation: Tribunal orders Discovery to reconsider debarments
The onus lies with the FSP to prove the facts it relies upon to debar its representative on a balance of probabilities.
The contract went through 10 iterations between July 2019 and March 2020, with the term ‘infectious and contagious diseases’ variously in or out.
Read moreThe onus lies with the FSP to prove the facts it relies upon to debar its representative on a balance of probabilities.
Medsafu’s letters alerted the applicant that the outcome of the process may include debarment, the Tribunal finds.
The Authority should have conducted its own investigation and not relied solely on information provided by the insurer, the Tribunal says.
There are differences in the circumstances surrounding the debarments and the reconsideration applications.
The FSP conflated the requirements for debarment under section 14 of the FAIS Act with the requirements and procedure for a debarment by the FSCA.
Insisting on a formal hearing at the Tribunal, and then not attending it, may have unpleasant consequences.
The Authority’s findings in respect of an investigation have no legal consequences, the FST says.
The Financial Services Tribunal says the dispute is ‘one of the many cases where employers use labour disputes to debar FSP representatives’.
The sales agent was accused of manipulating quotes to reduce clients’ motor vehicle insurance premiums.
“In the Moment” report projects a decline in fuel prices, a deceleration in food inflation, and the possibility of an interest rate cut in the second quarter.
If the rules do not state the actual composition of the board, it will not be possible to determine whether the board is properly constituted at any given time.
The fine of R2m imposed on AYO’s Khalid Abdulla was reduced to R1.2m.
‘A key individual is not only responsible to oversee the categories of financial services for which he is licensed, but he bears an oversight role in relation to the FSP generally.’