
Co-payments unpacked: the real drivers behind member shortfalls
A practical guide to why co-payments arise, how schemes set them, and how advisers can help clients manage the risk.

A practical guide to why co-payments arise, how schemes set them, and how advisers can help clients manage the risk.

This edition of Cover to Cover explains medical scheme dependant rules, required documentation, and how advisers can help clients keep their families covered.

This edition of Cover to Cover explains waiting periods, helping advisers guide clients on when benefits start and strategies to avoid gaps in cover.

The Supreme Court of Appeal will hear arguments on the merits if the appeal is upheld.

The High Court, endorsing the minority judgment’s view, rules the Fund must pay the medical expenses covered by Discovery Health.

Three medical schemes fell below the 25% solvency threshold in 2023.

The Board of Healthcare Funders says it will appeal after the High Court dismissed its application on procedural and substantive grounds.

Another attempt by the Road Accident Fund to contest liability based on the ‘majority decision’ against Discovery Health has fallen through.

In its long-awaited report, the Council for Medical Schemes says its preferred recommendation is not to introduce LCBOs.

The High Court in Cape Town rejects the Road Accident Fund’s contention that the Mlambo judgment has altered the legal landscape.

Downgrading to a lower plan may appear to be a cost-saving strategy, but it frequently results in increased out-of-pocket expenses.

Schemes and healthcare professionals are at odds over whether these recoveries are justified, says the Council for Medical Schemes.

The BHF’s canvassing of key policy issues in the public domain via a ‘deliberately leaked’ lawyer’s letter indicates the organisation ‘has run out of creative ideas’.

The CMS asserts that medical schemes have frequently disregarded the existing appeals procedures, exploiting them to the detriment of members’ interests.