
Ombud clears up big misconception about claims rejected for drunk driving
Insurers may reject claims where corroborating evidence places a driver at a pub, shows alcohol purchases, or records behaviour consistent with intoxication.

Insurers may reject claims where corroborating evidence places a driver at a pub, shows alcohol purchases, or records behaviour consistent with intoxication.

Lead Ombud Edite Teixeira-Mckinon warns against drawing hasty conclusions about complaints stats without factoring in claims volumes and policy counts.

Most complaints to the NFO went to the Non-life Division, whose interventions yielded R107m in quantifiable benefits for policyholders.

The NFO decided that Dotsure must indemnify the insured and waive the transfer-and-repurchase requirement, overturning strict adherence to the SAIA Code.

The insurer argued the hijacked vehicle should not have been on the road because the driver’s PrDP had expired.