
Complaints against medical schemes rise by 24.6%
The CMS’s 2025/26 annual report also highlights progress on a costed primary healthcare benefits package and research into linking administrator fees to outcomes.

The CMS’s 2025/26 annual report also highlights progress on a costed primary healthcare benefits package and research into linking administrator fees to outcomes.

Four months after a troubled administrator switch, Bonitas is betting on new products, tighter managed care, and a stronger digital offering to rebuild member value and trust.

Medscheme says it repeatedly warned Bonitas against a ‘clean-cut’ transition and disputes the scheme’s claim that unresolved legacy issues were behind the service disruptions experienced by members after the administration switch.

The medical scheme says legacy issues contributed to post-transition challenges as members report delays with hospital authorisations and medication approvals.

Shrinking younger membership is intensifying an ageing risk pool, pushing contributions higher even when hospital use is flat.

Internal directives cannot displace court orders or long-standing principles governing compensation, says the Western Cape High Court.

A practical guide to why co-payments arise, how schemes set them, and how advisers can help clients manage the risk.

After concluding its section 43 inquiry into Bonitas, the CMS has determined that the allegations merit a further forensic investigation.

The High Court, endorsing the minority judgment’s view, rules the Fund must pay the medical expenses covered by Discovery Health.

The outcome of Discovery Health’s appeal before the SCA will affect the outcome of the member’s claim for R1.4 million.

Another attempt by the Road Accident Fund to contest liability based on the ‘majority decision’ against Discovery Health has fallen through.

The High Court in Cape Town rejects the Road Accident Fund’s contention that the Mlambo judgment has altered the legal landscape.

A regulatory expert believes the judgment misinterpreted key legal principles in its ruling on the RAF’s obligation to reimburse medical schemes.

The High Court says Discovery Health misconstrued the scope of the judgment that set aside the RAF’s first directive on the payment of medical scheme members’ claims.