
Serious financial harm not enough to secure removal of SAFPS listing
The High Court recognised the potentially serious prejudice to the applicant but found that his evidence did not meet the threshold for interim relief.

The High Court recognised the potentially serious prejudice to the applicant but found that his evidence did not meet the threshold for interim relief.

The judgment underscores that, absent a fundamental shift in facts or law, courts will not allow steps that could prejudice unresolved disputes over member rights.