
When does a lead become intermediation? Four views on a judgment
Responses to the ruling reveal differing interpretations of the causal link required between lead-generation activities and a financial-product transaction.

Responses to the ruling reveal differing interpretations of the causal link required between lead-generation activities and a financial-product transaction.

The Tribunal found that proceedings had not commenced before the six-month deadline, preventing it from sending the matter back for reconsideration.

The Tribunal found that a serious breach of the duty to protect confidential client information can establish unfitness even where no misuse or harm is proved.

The Tribunal weighed the representative’s clean record and lack of personal gain against her deliberate falsification of a client’s investment instruction.

Key judgments clarified the FSCA’s ability to investigate misconduct, resist procedural delays, and pursue cross-border enforcement.

The regulator is scrutinising how derivative positions, suspicious trading, and failures by gatekeepers can undermine market integrity.

The Regulatory Actions Report shows how the Authority is combining penalties, licence withdrawals, and debarments to tackle serious misconduct.

The regulator highlights how digital scams, referral models, and trading signals can pull consumers into unlicensed services.

The regulator reports steady progress in licensing while sharing lessons from its AML inspections of authorised providers.

The extension preserves the existing framework allowing qualifying juristic representatives to collect and deal with insurance premiums on behalf of insurers.

Qualifying Category I and Category IV underwriting-manager FSPs remain exempt from the section 13 requirement, subject to the existing conditions.

Qualifying Category I FSPs that handle insurance premiums on behalf of insurers may continue relying on the existing exemption until 30 June 2029.

Qualifying providers and certain juristic representatives will continue to benefit from targeted regulatory relief, with the existing exemption conditions unchanged.

The decision highlights the distinction between punishing misconduct and compensating consumers who claim to have suffered losses.

The FSP could not prove key elements of the process, including proper notice of the proceedings, and the conduct of the hearing.

More than 20 years after his first conviction, a court found that Andrew Futcher ran another scheme that left investors millions out of pocket.

The High Court’s decision shows how commission-style lead arrangements can be characterised as FAIS intermediary services, with enforceability consequences.