
FSCA investigates Sanus after receiving client complaints
The regulator is examining possible contraventions involving the provider, which operates the EZInvest and Financix trading platforms.

The regulator is examining possible contraventions involving the provider, which operates the EZInvest and Financix trading platforms.

The Tribunal questioned Clientèle’s ‘free’ voucher advertising and sales script, while the insurer says its Royalty benefit is provided at no additional cost.

The FST says the factors in section 167 of the FSRA are individual in nature and must be assessed in determining the appropriate penalty for each person.

Responses to the ruling reveal differing interpretations of the causal link required between lead-generation activities and a financial-product transaction.

The Tribunal found that proceedings had not commenced before the six-month deadline, preventing it from sending the matter back for reconsideration.

The Tribunal found that a serious breach of the duty to protect confidential client information can establish unfitness even where no misuse or harm is proved.

The Tribunal weighed the representative’s clean record and lack of personal gain against her deliberate falsification of a client’s investment instruction.

Key judgments clarified the FSCA’s ability to investigate misconduct, resist procedural delays, and pursue cross-border enforcement.

The regulator is scrutinising how derivative positions, suspicious trading, and failures by gatekeepers can undermine market integrity.

The Regulatory Actions Report shows how the Authority is combining penalties, licence withdrawals, and debarments to tackle serious misconduct.

The regulator highlights how digital scams, referral models, and trading signals can pull consumers into unlicensed services.

The regulator reports steady progress in licensing while sharing lessons from its AML inspections of authorised providers.

The extension preserves the existing framework allowing qualifying juristic representatives to collect and deal with insurance premiums on behalf of insurers.

Qualifying Category I and Category IV underwriting-manager FSPs remain exempt from the section 13 requirement, subject to the existing conditions.

Qualifying Category I FSPs that handle insurance premiums on behalf of insurers may continue relying on the existing exemption until 30 June 2029.

Qualifying providers and certain juristic representatives will continue to benefit from targeted regulatory relief, with the existing exemption conditions unchanged.

The decision highlights the distinction between punishing misconduct and compensating consumers who claim to have suffered losses.