
Courts willing to consider evidence beyond a contract’s written terms
Modern contract interpretation permits surrounding circumstances to explain contractual meaning – undermining SARS’s argument that extrinsic evidence is inadmissible.

Modern contract interpretation permits surrounding circumstances to explain contractual meaning – undermining SARS’s argument that extrinsic evidence is inadmissible.

Three recent judgments in employment disputes underscore that courts will enforce only those restraint-of-trade clauses that are drafted with precision, protect a genuine employer interest, and strike a fair balance between competition and individual freedom

Synchronising employment agreements with the rules of occupational retirement funds promotes legal certainty, secures employee benefits, and smooths succession planning.

A recent judgment suggests employers may lose the right to enforce restraints of trade when they terminate staff for misconduct.

Can an employer rely on section 187(2)(b) of the Labour Relations Act when dismissing an employee who has worked beyond the normal or agreed retirement age?