
ConCourt clarifies scope of section 30P of the PFA proceedings
The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.
The Adjudicator breached audi alteram partem by making adverse findings about a Fund’s investigation without giving it a substantive opportunity to respond.
The Constitutional Court rules that whether someone qualifies as a dependant must be determined as at the date of a retirement fund member’s death, not when the fund decides how to distribute the benefit.
The Constitutional Court finds that a fund relied on unverified, one-sided information and failed to establish the extent of factual dependency.
A nominee who receives a dependency allocation can still claim a share of any surplus death benefit according to the deceased’s nominations.
The policyholder inflated her earnings and failed to disclose a simultaneous application with another insurer, materially affecting the risk assessment.
Sperm does not a father make and being a biological parent does not confer absolute rights, according to a ruling by the Pension Funds Adjudicator.
High Court hands down a decision on the interpretation of the tracing provision in section 37C of the Pension Funds Act.
‘The bloody hand does not inherit’ is an established common law principle, says the Pension Funds Adjudicator.
Interpretation Ruling 1 of 2020 incorrectly brought an unclaimed benefit within the ambit of section 37C of the Pension Funds Act.
The pension or provident fund is likely to have additional risk benefits that may change significantly when you leave your current company.
Notifications