
Sanctions-screening software is no shield against non-compliance
The FIC’s new manual explains when institutions should screen clients, how they must assess possible matches, and what follows when sanctioned property is identified.

The FIC’s new manual explains when institutions should screen clients, how they must assess possible matches, and what follows when sanctioned property is identified.

Accountable institutions should adopt practical, risk-based RMCPs tailored to their operations, rather than relying on lengthy templates.

The FSCA has uploaded recordings of its five-part webinar series aimed at helping CASPs meet their FICA obligations.

The FSCA identified serious lapses in Harith General Partners’ risk management, client due diligence, sanctions screening, and employee vetting.

Accountable institutions should consider the latest Terror Financing National Risk Assessment when implementing their RMCPs.

Accountable institutions are required to scrutinise client information against the targeted financial sanctions lists to identify designated persons and entities linked to clients.

These are the PCCs relating to beneficial ownership and the targeted financial sanctions obligations.

The FIC’s Public Compliance Communication addresses the updated approach to TFS as set out in the amended legislation.