
RAF liability for expenses paid by medical schemes ‘is settled law’ in W. Cape Division
The judgment criticises the Fund’s continued resistance to medical-expense claims already addressed in earlier Western Cape rulings.

The judgment criticises the Fund’s continued resistance to medical-expense claims already addressed in earlier Western Cape rulings.

The Constitutional Court must decide whether Parliament’s NHI process met constitutional standards – or whether the law must go back for a redo.

The High Court finds the Council must disclose the material it relies on before taking a decision that affects the provider’s ability to operate.

The appointment strengthens Medscheme’s foothold in the employer-based healthcare sector.

As third-party submissions open, SARS urges employers to file early and accurately or risk triggering errors, delays and taxpayer verifications.

Sanlam and Momentum outline how they are managing workforce, operations, and risk as the Bonitas transition proceeds despite an unresolved court challenge.

The CMS cites statutory constraints, while the Portfolio Committee on Health calls for a clear roadmap to implement the Inquiry’s recommendations.

The group plans to combine healthcare and financial data to refine risk assessment and product pricing.

Circular 10 introduces interim rules to standardise audits, investigations, and clawbacks as broader reforms are developed.

Medscheme’s bid to halt Bonitas’ administration transition has been delayed after procedural lapses and unresolved interlocutory issues forced the matter off the urgent roll.

In this edition of Cover to Cover, we unpack the structural, regulatory, and underwriting differences that advisers must clarify before recommending either healthcare funding option.

Bonitas, Medscheme, and PHA trade accusations as court papers, whistleblower claims, and a CMS probe intensify the battle over medical scheme contracts.

Internal directives cannot displace court orders or long-standing principles governing compensation, says the Western Cape High Court.

The CMS frames the judgment as necessary to protect members, emphasising the scheme is compliant, operational and under close oversight.

The scheme and the regulator say a narrowly focused investigation will not halt the transition – but members should brace for some operational changes.

This edition of Cover to Cover looks at how members can plan, track, and optimise their medical savings to reduce out-of-pocket costs and get the most from their benefits.

Bonitas’ decision to change administrators comes amid a CMS investigation and High Court proceedings involving its former service provider.